Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Gary Oliver's avatar

Beautifully written and comforting.

The inventor who is often misunderstood and unrewarded … finds ample compensation in the pleasing exercises of his(her) powers and in the knowledge of being one of that exceptionally privileged class without whom the race would have long ago perished in the bitter struggle against pitiless elements. Speaking for myself, I have already had more than my full measure of this exquisite enjoyment, so much that for many years my life was little short of continuous rapture.

— Nikola Tesla

All things are made of atoms—little particles that move around in perpetual motion, attracting each other when they are a little distance apart, but repelling upon being squeezed into one another. In that one sentence ... there is an enormous amount of information about the world.

¬— Richard P. Feynman

Brandon Hendrickson's avatar

Yes, this! The absolute lack of this in my education (so many antiseptic cell diagrams...) is why, as soon as I could, I avoided science classes.

As a person who now spends much of his time re-enchanting the microverse, I'll just add that one way of deepening this experience is to play with suites of different feelings for the same phenomenon. Harvard Biovisions, for example, really broke new ground when they followed up their famous "Inner Life of a Cell" video (the one that went viral, got a TED talk, & made kinesin cute) with another version that seems to have taken pointers from H. P. Lovecraft — the cell as eldritch entropy, the proteins as unwilling actors: https://youtu.be/uHeTQLNFTgU

Obviously, it's a different take than the one you suggest here! But they're both on the side of making people FEEL things, and grounding emotion in understanding.

I'm working on a new approach to the K-12 science curriculum. Anyone know other folks who are already doing this?

10 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?